Side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool for your business
Our Verdict: Midjourney for polished aesthetics, Flux for speed and customization
Midjourney produces the most aesthetically refined images out of any generator — its outputs look like they came from a professional photographer or digital artist. Flux (by Black Forest Labs) counters with open-source flexibility, faster generation, and better text rendering. If you need images that look stunning with minimal prompting, pick Midjourney. If you need to fine-tune models, run locally, or integrate into a production pipeline, Flux wins.
Marketing teams and designers who need polished visuals quickly
$10/mo (Basic, 200 images) / $30/mo (Standard, 900 images) / $60/mo (Pro, 1,800 images)
beginner
1 day
Developers and studios needing customizable image generation pipelines
Free (open-source) / $0.003-0.05 per image (API providers)
intermediate
2-5 days
| Feature | Midjourney | Flux |
|---|---|---|
| Self-hosting | No | Yes (local GPU or cloud) |
| Fine-tuning | No | Yes (LoRA, DreamBooth) |
| Text in images | Poor to moderate | Excellent |
| Generation speed | 30-60 seconds | 2-10 seconds (Schnell) |
| API access | Limited | Yes (multiple providers) |
| Inpainting | Yes (web editor) | Yes (ComfyUI/API) |
| Batch generation | 4 images per prompt | Unlimited (local/API) |
| Style consistency | High (built-in aesthetic) | Variable (prompt-dependent) |
One prompt generates a polished, professional image ready for production. No GPU setup, no fine-tuning, no post-processing needed.
Self-hosted Flux Schnell generates images in 2-4 seconds at near-zero marginal cost. Midjourney's subscription caps at 1,800 images/month on Pro.
LoRA fine-tuning trains Flux on brand assets for consistent style. Midjourney can't be fine-tuned and style varies across prompts.
Beautiful results with simple prompts. The web editor handles variations and touch-ups without leaving the browser.
We implement both options. Tell us your use case and we'll recommend the right fit — then set it up for you.
Not universally — they excel at different things. Midjourney produces more aesthetically pleasing images with less effort. Flux is better for text rendering, speed, and customization. In blind tests, Midjourney wins on 'beauty' while Flux wins on accuracy and prompt adherence.
Flux.1 Schnell runs on an NVIDIA GPU with 12GB+ VRAM (RTX 3060 or better). Flux.1 Dev needs 24GB+ (RTX 4090 or A100). For production, most teams use cloud GPUs via Replicate, fal.ai, or Together AI at $0.003-0.05 per image.
With effort, yes. Midjourney's advantage is its built-in aesthetic bias — it makes everything look good by default. Flux can match this quality with fine-tuned LoRAs and detailed prompts, but it takes more skill. Out of the box, Midjourney is prettier.
Both allow commercial use, but the terms differ. Midjourney requires a paid plan for commercial rights. Flux Schnell is Apache 2.0 (fully open for commercial use). Flux Dev has a non-commercial research license. For commercial pipelines at scale, Flux Schnell is more cost-effective.